[Skip to Content]
Visit us on Facebook Visit us on FacebookVisit us on Twitter Visit us on TwitterVisit our RSS Feed View our RSS Feed
NEO Shop Talk October 25th, 2020
CategoriesCategoriesCategories Contact UsContact Us ArchivesArchives Region/OfficeNEO Main Site SearchSearch



Date prong graphic

What in Tarnation is Evaluability Assessment and Why Should We Care?

Posted by on July 7th, 2017 Posted in: Blog, Bloggers' Bookshelf, Practical Evaluation

Clip board with chartRecently on Twitter I found a publication on evaluability assessment of impact evaluation. The tweet stated that an evaluability assessment would save time and money in the long run.

That’s good right? Evaluability was a new concept for me, so I read the small publication: Evaluability Assessment for Impact Evaluation: Guidance, Checklists and Decision Support, by Greet Peersman, Irene Guijt & Tiina Pasanen.  Obviously, you can read it for yourself, but here are some of the things that I was happy to learn.

What is evaluability???  Essentially it is ‘the extent to which an activity or project can be evaluated in a reliable and credible fashion’ (from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development – Development Assistance Committee).

Why do we want to assess evaluability?

  • To catch any holes or errors in the logic of our evaluation plan – to ensure that our evaluation will effectively show the connection between the project and the impact or outcome we want to see.
  • To design an evaluation that is valid, efficient and useful, thus preventing wasted time and resources.
  • To ensure that the evaluation will do what the stakeholders need it to do in the long run.

When would an evaluability assessment take place? It would be most helpful to do an evaluability assessment as a part of your evaluation planning, before the project and data collection activities take place.

How does evaluability assessment affect outcomes-based evaluation?

The authors focus on three basic questions:

  1. Is it plausible to expect impact? Is it logical that what you are doing will lead to the outcomes you expect?
  2. Would an impact evaluation be useful and used? Have you clearly identified how the evaluation will be used by the stakeholders? Do your stakeholders find your evaluation methods credible?
  3. Is it feasible to assess or measure impact? Some outcomes data is really difficult and expensive to collect – can you reasonably expect people to collect the data that you want in the time frame that you need it? Is there good data that is already being collected that can be used? Is your evaluation plan within your budget?

I think we do many of these steps when planning our evaluations.  But using a checklist to make sure that all of them are included is really helpful- and the authors provide a checklist and decision support tool at the end of the publication.  It’s broken down so nicely that I added it to the NEO’s Tools and Resources page (under the Evaluation Planning tab).

Image of the author ABOUT nnlmneo

Email author View all posts by
This project is funded by the National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH) under cooperative agreement number UG4LM012343 with the University of Washington.

NNLM and NETWORK OF THE NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE are service marks of the US Department of Health and Human Services | Copyright | Download PDF Reader